RAS History & PhilologyЭтнографическое обозрение Ethno review

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-5415
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6274

Research Infrastructures of Russian Laboratories: Before and After Sanctions

PII
S3034627425060109-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034627425060109
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 6
Pages
168-191
Abstract
The article dives into biographies of Russian scientific labs in the context of infrastructure work, where infrastructure work is taken to mean practical activities aimed at developing scientific infrastructure and solving the problems arising along the process. This helps focusing on mobilization procedures (rather than on “structures”) that are built into relations with institutions of science management, practices of lab operation, material resources, and individual research strategies. I attempt to explore the infrastructural makeup of the Russian scientific lab and the changes it has been undergoing in the period marked by economic and political transformations and alterations in the access to global technological markets as a result of sanction policies. The research draws on the comparative analysis of two case studies based on field interviews with lab managers and staff, conducted in 2012–2024. Trying to trace the biographies of these labs from the point of their origins through the present day, I argue that the infrastructure of the regular Russian lab is essentially prone to instability, which requires specific forms of adaptation to the ever-changing conditions. That adaptation, however, may be seen as instrumental in the success of reshaping lab work – particularly after 2022 when stricter sanctions began to be imposed – and developing new collaborations with Asian institutions. The cases under examination, nevertheless, show that there has been certain shift toward applied studies at the expense of more fundamental studies in the lab work, followed, for instance, by a move away from more traditional research themes in physics or chemistry toward more interdisciplinary medical research.
Keywords
инфраструктуры экспериментальная наука лабораторная наука новые онтологии STS
Date of publication
02.02.2026
Year of publication
2026
Number of purchasers
0
Views
6

References

  1. 1. ПМА 1 – Полевые материалы автора. Сбор интервью в лабораториях. Ноябрь 2023 – июнь 2024 г. (всего 17 интервью).
  2. 2. ПМА 2 – Полевые материалы автора. Сбор интервью в лабораториях. Октябрь–ноябрь 2014 г., март 2015 г. (всего 34 интервью).
  3. 3. ПМА 3 – Полевые материалы автора. Сбор интервью в лабораториях. Февраль–апрель, октябрь–ноябрь 2012 г., февраль–апрель 2013 г. (всего 36 интервью).
  4. 4. Артюшина А.В. О правилах воспроизводства “невидимой науки”: сетевая структура российской научной лаборатории // Этнографическое обозрение. 2012. № 3. С. 13–28.
  5. 5. Попова Е.В., Мацепуро Д.М. Исследовательская этика: представления и практики российских молодых ученых // Высшее образование в России. 2024. Т. 33 (7). С. 124–143. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-7-124-143
  6. 6. Соколовский С.В. (отв. ред.) Российская антропология и “онтологический поворот”. М.: ИЭА РАН, 2017.
  7. 7. Bowker G.C., Star S.L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000.
  8. 8. Edwards P.N. Global Climate Science, Uncertainty and Politics: Data-Laden Models, Model-Filtered Data // Science as Culture. 1999. Vol. 8 (4). P. 437–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439909526558
  9. 9. Edwards P.N. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2010.
  10. 10. Fujimura J.H. Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects, and “Translation”// Science as Practice and Culture / Ed. A. Pickering. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992. Р. 168–211.
  11. 11. Graham L.R., Dezhina I. Science in the New Russia: Crisis, Aid, Reform. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.
  12. 12. Hackett E.J., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M., Wajcman J. (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.
  13. 13. Howe C. et al. Paradoxical Infrastructures: Ruins, Retrofit, and Risk // Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2015. Vol. 41 (3). P. 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915620017
  14. 14. Igo S.E. The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
  15. 15. Karasti H., Baker K.S., Millerand F. Infrastructure Time: Long-Term Matters in Collaborative Development // Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2010. Vol. 19 (3–4). P. 377–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z
  16. 16. Larkin B. The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure // Annual Review of Anthropology. 2013. Vol. 42 (1). P. 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
  17. 17. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
  18. 18. Lawrence T., Suddaby R., Leca B. Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization // Journal of Management Inquiry. 2011. Vol. 20 (1). Р. 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222
  19. 19. Mignolo W.D. Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking // Globalization and the Decolonial Option / Eds. W.D. Mignolo, A. Escobar. L.: Routledge, 2013. Р. 1–21.
  20. 20. Ong A., Collier S.J. (eds.) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Malden: Blackwell, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696569
  21. 21. Ribes D., Finholt T.A. The Long Now of Technology Infrastructure: Articulating Tensions in Development // Journal for the Association of Information Systems. 2009. Vol. 10 (5). P. 375–398. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00199
  22. 22. Ribes D., Polk J.B. Flexibility Relative to What? Change to Research Infrastructure // Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2014. Vol. 15 (5). Р. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00360
  23. 23. Santos B. de S. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. L.: Routledge, 2014.
  24. 24. Schabacher G. Mobilizing Transport: Media, Actor-Worlds, and Infrastructures // Transfers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies. 2013. Vol. 3 (1). P. 75–95.
  25. 25. Star S.L. The Ethnography of Infrastructure // American Behavioral Scientist. 1999. Vol. 43 (3). P. 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326
  26. 26. Vermeulen N., Parker J.N., Penders B. Understanding Life Together: A Brief History of Collaboration in Biology // Endeavour. 2013. Vol. 37 (3). P. 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2013.03.001
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library