Везде
NEW TRENDS IN THE U.S. ELECTION PROCESS: ELECTRONIC AND INTERNET VOTING
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
NEW TRENDS IN THE U.S. ELECTION PROCESS: ELECTRONIC AND INTERNET VOTING
Annotation
PII
S268667300000616-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Grigory Yarygin 
Edition
Issue 9 (561)
Pages
90-104
Abstract
The article is focused on the analysis of modern trends in electronic voting currently practiced in the USA. The role and potential of remote electronic ballots casting are determined. Factors contributing to and preventing from broad implementation of internet-voting at the election process at different levels are identified. The author examines perspective of employment of internet-voting. The author also provides analysis of internet-voting dimension of the presidential electoral campaign of 2016. General findings suggest that there are technological capacity, social adaptability, economic expediency and at the same time political moderation in wide scale application of internet-voting in the U.S. election practice.
Keywords
USA, the U.S. electoral process, voting technologies, electronic voting, internet-voting, online voting, the United States presidential election of 2016
Date of publication
09.09.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
993
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Alverez M.R., Hall T.E. point, click and vote: the future of internet voting. Washington, D.C.:, Brookings Institution Press. 2004. 204 p.
 2. Assessing Internet Voting as an Early Voting Reform in the United States // Proceedings of 3rd international Conference on Electronic Voting 2008. Robert Krimmer, Rüdiger Grimm (Eds.). 77 p.
 3. Berinsky A. The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States // American Politics Research, 2005. Vol. 33. P. 471-491.
 4. Desilver D. U.S. voter turnout trails most developed countries. Pew Research Center. 06.05.2015. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/06/u-s-voter-turnout-trails-most-developed-countries/ (accessed 10.01.2016).
 5. Eggers W.D. Government 2.0: using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc. 2007. 299 p. 
 6. Gimpel J.G., Morris I. L. et al. Turnout and the local age distribution: examining political participation across space and time // Political Geography, 2004. Vol. 23, No. 1. P. 71-95.
 7. Gimpel J.G., Dyck J.J., Daron R.S. Location, knowledge and time pressures in the spatial structure of convenience voting // Electoral Studies. Vol. 25, Issue 1, March 2006. P. 35-58.
 8. Lawless J.L. Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office. Cambridge University Press. 2012. 304 p.
 9. Moynihan D.P. Building Secure Elections: E-Voting, Security, and Systems Theory // Public Administration Review. 2004. Vol. 64, Issue 5, September. P. 515-528.
 10. Mursi M., Assassa G. On the Development of Electronic Voting: A Survey // International Journal of Computer Applications, 2013. Vol. 61. No.16, January. P. 1.
 11. Perrin A., Duggan M. Americans’ Internet Access: 2000-2015. Pew Research Center, June 2015. P. 2. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/06/2015-06-26_internet-usage-across-demographics-discover_FINAL.pdf (accessed 24.12.2015).
 12. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. 2003. 576 p.
 13. Stenerud I. S.G., Bull C. When reality comes knocking: Norwegian experiences with verifiable electronic voting // Electronic Voting, 2012. Vol. 205. P. 21-33.
 14. United Nations E-Government Surveys: 2014 E-Government for the Future We Want. New York. 2014. 284 p.
 15. Voting Equipment in the United States. Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. Available at: https://www.verifiedvoting.org/resources/voting-equipment/ (accessed 15.01.2016).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate