Везде
Triadic nature of visual image as a basis of visible component representation in communicative space
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Triadic nature of visual image as a basis of visible component representation in communicative space
Annotation
PII
S2413-90840000616-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalia Lukianova 
Edition
Volume 25 Issue 1
Pages
125-135
Abstract
The article is devoted to the research of the nature, structure and mechanisms of emergence and existence conditions of visible component representation in order to clarify the principles of the functioning of visual image in communicative space. The understanding of these processes is important for the solution of the problem of the identification of organization principles in communicative space, where the creation of images mobilizing irrational connotations comes to the first place. Based on the triadic nature of a sign in the concept of C.S. Pierce, the author proposes her own methodological strategy for the study of the nature of the representation of visible component, expanding the theoretical potential of semiotic analysis of an image as an iconic sign. The proposed methodology is based on the cornerstone of the philosophy of Pierce (phaneroscopy) - essentially triadic of a sign (sign, object, interpretant) in connection with the categories of existence and cognition (Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness). With this approach, a sign is considered as a “matrix” for the creation of visual images. The relevance of the proposed research lies in the description of the triadic nature of visual image in communicative space. It is proved that a visual image is not an inherent iconic sign. It should be considered as a representation of visible component in the sequence of movement of three modes of existence (possibility, actuality and reality). The proposed triadic model of the representation of visible component made it possible to reveal the processes of formation of visual image in communication. The key provisions of the triadic sign theory allowed concluding that the processes of the formation of visual images in the modern culture of representative expansion, when one image becomes the image of another image and expresses it are interrelated.
Keywords
image, visuality, representations, semiotics, Charles Sanders Pierce, triadic nature of a sign, communicative space
Date of publication
01.06.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
513
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Atkins, 2017 – Atkins, R. Peirce, “Muybridge, and the Moving Pictures of Thought”, in: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Indiana University Press, 2017, pp. 511‒527.[https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.4.01, accessed on 01.02.2020].
    2. 

  2. Arnheim, 1974 – Arnheim,R. Iskusstvo i vtzual’noe vopriyatie [Art and visual perception], trans. by V. Samochina Moscow: Progress Publ., 1974. 386 pp. (In Russian)
    3. 

  3. Barulin, 2000 – Barulin, A.N. “Osnovaniya semiotiki. Znaki, znakovye sistemy, kommunikaciya” [The Foundations of Semiotics Signs, Sign Systems, Communication]. Moscow: Sport I Kul’tura Publ., 2000, 263 pp. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Baudrillard, 2006 – Baudrillard, J. “Obshchestvo potrebleniya: mify i struktura” [Consumer Society: Myths and Structure], trans. by Samarskya M., Moscow: Respublika; Kul’turnaya revolyuciya Publ., 2006. 269 pp. (In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Boczkowski, Matassi, Mitchelstein, 2018 – Boczkowski, P., Matassi, M. & Mitchelstein, E. “How Young Users Deal With Multiple Platforms: The Role of Meaning-Making in Social Media Repertoires”, Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2018, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 245‒259.
    6. 

  6. Cantor, 2010 – Cantor, R. “Conceptual embodiment in visual semiotics”, Semiotica, 2016, vol. 210, pp. 215‒234.
    7. 

  7. Debord, 1999 – Debord, G. Obshchestvo spektaklya [Performance society], trans. by Ofeteras S. & Yakubovich, M., Moscow: Logos Publ., 1999. 224 pp. (In Russian)
    8. 

  8. Highfield, 2016 – Highfield, T. “Instagrammatics and digital methods: studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji”, Communication research and practice, 2016, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47‒62.
    9. 

  9. Eco, 2004 – Eco, U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura [Missing structure], trans. from ital. by Reznik V. & Pogonailo A. Saint Petersburg: Symposium, 2004. 544 pp. (In Russian)
    10. 

  10. Guagnano, Mininni, 2017 – Guagnano, G., Mininni, G. “Translation as sign exploration: A semiotic approach based on Peirce”, Semiotica, 2017, vol. 225, pp. 129‒140.
    11. 

  11. Kolapietro, 2008 – Kolapietro, V. “Ch.S. Pirs, 1839‒1914” [C.S. Peirce, 1839‒1914]. in: The Blackwell Guide to American Philosophy, ed. by Marsoobian A. & Ryder J. Moscow: IdeaPress, 200, pp.121‒156. (In Russian)
    12. 

  12. Lukianova, 2010 – Lukianova, N.A. Ot znaka k semioticheskim konstruktam kommunikativnogo prostranstva [From sign to semiotic constructs of communicative space]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta Publ., 2010. 245 pp. (in Russian)
    13. 

  13. Prøitz, 2018 – Prøitz, L. “Visual social media and affectivity: the impact of the image of Alan Kurdi and young people’s response to the refugee crisis in Oslo and Sheffield”, Information, Communication & Society, 2018, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 548‒563.
    14. 

  14. Nöth, 2001 – Nöth, W. “Charl'z Sanders Pirs” [Charles S. Peirce], Kritika i semiotika, 2001, no. 3‒4, pp. 5‒32. (in Russian)
    15. 

  15. Savchuk, 2013 – Savchuk, V.V. Fenomen povorota v kul’ture XX veka [The phenomenon of rotation in the culture of the twentieth century], Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury, 2013, no. 1, pp. 93‒108. (In Russian)
    16. 

  16. Wilson, 2017 – Wilson, A. “The Peircean Solution to Non-Existence Problems: Immediate and Dynamical Objects”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 2017, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 528‒552.
    17.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate