Везде
David Hume's epistemology and its contemporary importance
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
David Hume's epistemology and its contemporary importance
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000616-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vadim Vasilyev 
Edition
Volume 57 Issue 1
Pages
166-180
Abstract
The paper is about some epistemological ideas of David Hume. At first, I give a review of his most influential epistemological conceptions: his exposition of the problem of induction in the context of his investigation of the nature of empirical reasonings, his analysis of epistemic status of the principle of causation, and his skeptical arguments concerning existence of external world and demonstrative knowledge. Then I discuss those Hume’s epistemological ideas which, as I believe, are usually not rightly understood in literature about Hume’s philosophy. They are connected to his theory of probabilistic reasonings. It is quite common to contrast his theory with approach of Thomas Bayes, but I try to show that in reality Hume’s theory is in perfect agreement with the Bayes’ theorem. In order to do this I interpret a topic of probability of our belief in testimonies of miracles, which Hume discusses, in terms of Bayes’ theorem: P(miracle/testimony) = P(testimony/miracle) x P(miracle) // P(testimony). According to this interpretation a probability of veracity of testimony of a miraclediminishes with diminishing of probability of miracles and diminishes when probability of testimonies increases. That’s very Hume’s position. At the end of the paper I discuss Hume’s insights on non-rational aspects of human cognition, which had anticipated some recent developments in cognitive psychology. In thiscontext I also consider a possibility of justification of our principles of empirical cognition in Hume’s epistemology. I argue that Hume gave a kind of justification of them after all in terms of final causes, and quite legitimate.
Keywords
David Hume, epistemology, problem of induction, principle of causation, Bayes’ theorem
Date of publication
01.03.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
523
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Audi, R. Epistemology: Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2003, 352 pp.
    2. 

  2. Dale, A.I. Most Honourable Remembrance: The Life and Work of Thomas Bayes. New York: Springer, 2003, 686 pp.
    3. 

  3. Dicker, G. Hume’s Epistemology and Metaphysics: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 1998, 229 pp.
    4. 

  4. Earman, J. Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, 217 pp.
    5. 

  5. Earman, J. “Bayes, Hume, Price, and Miracles”, Proceedings of the British Academy, 2002, vol. 113, pp. 91‒109.
    6. 

  6. Fogelin, R. A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003, 128 pp.
    7. 

  7. Howson, C. Hume’s Problem: Induction and Justification of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, 272 pp.
    8. 

  8. Hume, D. Sochineniya v 2-x t. [Works, in Two Volumes]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1994. (In Russian)
    9. 

  9. Johnsen, B. Righting Epistemology: Hume’s Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 303 pp.
    10. 

  10. Kasavin I. T. “David Hume. Shest’ epistemologicheskikh paradoksov” [David Hume. Six Epistemological Paradoxes], in: Kasavin, I.T. (ed.). David Hume i sovremennaya filosofiya [David Hume and Contemporary Philosophy], Moscow: Alfa-M, 2012, pp. 27‒52. (In Russian)
    11. 

  11. Lektorskii V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya [Epistemology Classical and Non-classical]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001, 256 pp. (In Russian)
    12. 

  12. McGrayne, S.B. The Theory that Would not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011, 335 pp.
    13. 

  13. Meeker, K. Hume’s Radical Scepticism and the Fate of Naturalized Epistemology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 210 pp.
    14. 

  14. Owen, D. “Hume Versus Price on Miracles and Prior Probabilities: Testimony and the Bayesian Calculation”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 1987, vol. 37, no. 147,
    15. 

  15. pp. 187‒202.
    16. 

  16. Price, R. “On the Importance of Christianity and the Nature of Historical Evidence, and Miracles”. 2nd ed. 1768, in: Earman, J. Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 157‒176.
    17. 

  17. Schmitt, F.F. Hume’s Epistemology in the Treatise: A Veritistic Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 423 pp.
    18. 

  18. Sobel, J.H. “On the Evidence of Testimony for Miracles: A Bayesian Interpretation of David Hume’s Analysis”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 1987, vol. 37, no. 147, pp. 166‒186.
    19.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate