Везде
Science in danger or technoscience becomes dangerous?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Science in danger or technoscience becomes dangerous?
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000616-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Koshovets  Igor Frolov
Edition
Volume 57 Issue 1
Pages
51-58
Abstract
This paper summarizes the discussion on technoscience and its key question whether the phenomenon indicated by this term means a radical transformation of science and its replacement with some new social objectification. Based on the remarks of the discussion participants, we raise questions on mathematical rationality contribution in technoscience development, technical (magical) domination on nature (environment) and man as the leitmotif of the New European culture and the connection of techno-science, financial capital and liberal capitalism.
Keywords
technoscience, academic science, scientific ethos, capitalization of science
Date of publication
01.03.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
584
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Koshovets, O.B., Ganichev, N.A. “Global’naya cifrovaya transformaciya i ee celi: deklaracii, real’nost’ i novyj mekhanizm rosta” [Global Digital Transformation and Its Goals: Declarations, Reality and The New Growth Mechanism], Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii, 2018, no. 4, pp. 126‒144. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Macnaghten, P., Kearnes, M., Wynne, B. “Nanotechnology, Governance and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?”, Science Communication, 2005, Vol. 27/2, pp. 268‒291.
    3. 

  3. Romanov, V.N. Istoricheskoe razvitie kul’tury. Psihologo-tipologicheskij aspect [The historical development of culture. Psycho-typological aspect]. Moscow: Izdatel' Savin S.A, 2003, 447 pp. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Talagaeva, D.A. “Evropejskoe issledovatel’skoe prostranstvo v dejstvii: programma ‘Gorizont 2020’” [European Research Area in Action: Horizon 2020], Polis, 2018, no. 1, pp. 175‒183. (In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Ylönen, M., Pellizzoni, L. (ed). Neoliberalism and Technoscience: Critical Assessments (Theory, Technology and Society). New York: Routledge, 2012, 256 pp.
    6.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate