Technoscience – science without scientists?
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Technoscience – science without scientists?
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000616-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
32-37
Abstract
The article outlines a look at technoscience or mode 2 as a results of the development of statistics as a mathematical method and an instrument of social management, as well as the deprofessionalization of science due to the overproduction of specialists and the introduction of design forms of work into the practice of the scientific community. A decrease of the scientists’ expert status is noted, and an assessment is given of the prospects for the complete degeneration of classical science into the technoscience.
Keywords
technoscience, academic science, scientific community, scientific ethos
Date of publication
01.03.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
570
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Böhme, G., Van Den Daele, W., Krohn W. “The scientification of technology”, in Schäfer, W. (ed.) Finalization in Science. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983, pp.173-205.
  2. Bourdieu P. “Science of Science and Reflexivity”. Polity Press, 2004.
  3. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott P., Trow, M. (eds) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. SAGE, 1994.
  4. Gingras I. Sociologie des sciences. Presses Universitaires de France, 2013
  5. Gorokhov, V. “Galileo’s “Technoscience””, in Pisano, F. (ed.) A Bridge Between Conceptual Frameworks. Springer, 2015, pp.207-228.
  6. Jamison, A. “Turning Engineering Green: Sustainable Development and Engineering Education”, in Christensen, S., Mitcham, C., Li, B., An, Y. (eds.) Engineering, Development and Philosophy. Springer, 2012, pp.7-22.
  7. Pinto L. “Filosofskaya zhurnalistika”, [Philosophical journalism], in: S/Λ’97. Socio-Logos postmodernisma [The Socio-Logos of Postmodernism]. Moscow: Institut eksperimental’noi sotsiologii, 1996, pp. 30–56. (In Russian)
  8. Porter T.M.. Trust in Numbers. The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press, 1995.
  9. Varkhotov T. A., Alasania K. Y., Bryzgalina E. V., Gavrilenko S. M., Ryzhov A. L., Shkomova E. M. “Techno-science and the scientific ethos: the outlines of ethics of biobanking through the eyes of the russian scientific community”, ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2018, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 61-83.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate