Scientific realism as constructive empiricism: a methodology of interpretation of quantum mechanics
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Scientific realism as constructive empiricism: a methodology of interpretation of quantum mechanics
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000616-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
179-191
Abstract
Two conceptions of the contemporary philosophy of science are taken under consideration: scientific realism and constructive empiricism. Scientific realism presupposes 1) the conception of truth as the correspondence of knowledge to reality, 2) the real existence of entities postulated by a theory. The constructive empiricism puts forward the idea of empirical adequacy: science aims to give us the theories which are empirically adequate and acceptance of the theory involves as belief only that it is empirically adequate. To compare methodological resources of these two positions in the philosophy of science the problem of the interpretation of quantum mechanics is involved. As a methodological realization of scientific realism the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics is taken under consideration. K.Popper’s version of the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics is outlined along M. Jammer’s book on the history of the philosophy of quantum mechanics. As a contemporary version of the ensemble approach L.Ballentine’s book on quantum mechanics is mentioned. Van Fraassen’s version of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics is taken under consideration to show a methodological realization of constructive empiricism.
Keywords
the structure of the theory, materialism, metaphysics, empirical phenomena, the Copenhagen interpretation
Date of publication
01.06.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
527
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Ballentine, L.E. Quantum Mechanics. New York: Prentice-Hall International, 1990, 486 pp.
  2. Ballentine, L.E. The “Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, Reviews of Modern Physics, 1970, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 358‒371.
  3. Blokhintsev, D.I. Osnovy kvantovoi mekhaniki [Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. 5th ed.]. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, 664 pp. (In Russian)
  4. Jammer, М. The Philosophy of Quantum Merchanics: The Interpretations of QM in Historical Perspective. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1974, 536 pp.
  5. Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic Scientific Explanation. Boston: Harcourt, 1961, 618 pp.
  6. Pechenkin, A. “The Early Ensemble Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in the USA and USSR”, Studies History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 2‒11.
  7. Pechenkin, A.A. “Ansamblevye interpretatsii kvantovoi mekhaniki v SShA I SSSR” [Ensemble Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in the USA and USSR],
  8. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya – Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7. Philosophy, 2004, no. 6, pp. 103‒121. (In Russian)
  9. Pechenkin, A.A. “Modal'naya interpretatsiya kvantovoi mekhaniki kak «anti-kollapsovskaya » interpretatsiya” [Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics as an “Qnti-Collaps” Interpretation], Filosofiya nauki – Philosophy of Science, vol. 6, no. 1. Moscow: IF RAN, 2000, pp. 31‒39. (In Russian)
  10. Popper, K.R. Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London & New York: Routledge, 1962, 608 pp.
  11. Popper, K.R. Realism and the Aim of Science. London: Hutchinson, 1983, 464 pp.
  12. Popper, K.R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London & New York: Routledge, 1959, 544 pp.
  13. Putnam, H. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, 380 pp.
  14. Sellars, W. Science, Perception and Reality. New York: Humanity Press, 1962, 368 pp.
  15. van Fraassen, B.C. Quantum Mechanics. An Empiricist View. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991, 560 pp.
  16. van Fraassen, B.C. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980, 248 pp.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate