STATISTICAL METHOD OF PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS AGGREGATION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
STATISTICAL METHOD OF PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS AGGREGATION
Annotation
PII
S042473880000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
112-128
Abstract
The article discusses the aggregation of production functions (PF). It is shown that consistent aggregation of PF is possible only in very special cases. A statistical aggregation method is suggested. It allows to synthesize new kinds of macroeconomic PF. Macroeconomic PF for the US economy based on industrial Cobb-Douglas PF with a normal distribution parameters is constructed and investigated. For the Russian economy the aggregate PF obtained on the basis of sectoral and regional Cobb-Douglas PF. It is shown that in case of scarcity of statistical data the more correct estimations of the aggregate PF for Russia may be derived using regional PF.
Keywords
production function, consistent aggregation, statistical approach
Date of publication
01.04.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
902
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bessonov V.A., Tsukhlo S.V. (2002). Analiz ehkonomicheskoj dinamiki rossijskoj perekhodnoj ehkonomiki. M.: Institut ehkonomiki perekhodnogo perioda.  

Grebnev M.I. (2013). Postroenie agregirovannoj proizvodstvennoj funktsii dlya ehkonomiki Rossii // European Sodal Sde^e Journal. T. 1. № 12. S. 438-445.  

Ershov Eh.B. (2013). Kompozitnye proizvodstvennye funktsii // Ehkonomicheskij zhurnal VShEh. T. 17. № 1. S.108-129.        

Klejner G.B. (1986). Proizvodstvennye funktsii: Teoriya, metody, primenenie. M.: Finansy i statistika.           

Koehn A., Kharkurt Dzh. (2009). Sud'ba dvukh Kembridzhej o teorii kapitala // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 8. S. 4-27.       

Perskij Yu.K., Shul'ts D.N. (2005). Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie ehkonomiki kak ierarkhicheskoj sistemy // Zhurnal ehkonomicheskoj teorii. № 2. S. 25-46.              

Petrov A.A., Pospelov I.G., Shananin A.A. (1996). Opyt matematicheskogo modelirovaniya ehkonomiki. M.: Ehnergoatomizdat.        

Porokhovskij A.A. (2002). Vektor ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. M.: TEIS.             

Pospelov I.G. (2001). Ehkonomicheskie agenty i sistemy balansov. Preprint WP2/2001/03. M.: GU VShEh.    

Fel's Eh., Tinter G. (1971). Metody ehkonomicheskikh issledovanij. M.: Progress.    

Shul'ts D.N. (2014a). Mikroehkonomicheskoe fundirovanie makroehkonomiki i printsip dopolnitel'nosti Bora // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki RAN. № 2. S.157-165.               

Shul'ts D.N. (2014b). Problematika ierarkhicheskogo analiza v osnovnykh napravleniyakh ehkonomicheskoj teorii XX v. // Zhurnal ehkonomicheskoj teorii. № 2. S.130-138.          

Dresch F.W. (1938). Index Numbers and the General Economic Equilibrium // Bulletin of the Amer^an Mathematwal Sodety. Vol. 44. R.134-141.         

Felipe J., Fisher F.M. (2003). Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists Should Know // Metroeconomica. Vol. 54. No. 3. R. 208-262.       

Felipe J., McCombie J.S.L. (2013). The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change: “Not Even Wrong”. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.           

Klein L.R. (1946a). Macroeconomics and the Theory of Rational Behavior // E^^me^^a. Vol. 14. No. 2. R. 93-108.             

Klein L.R. (1946b). Remarks on the Theory of Aggregation // Econometrica. Vol. 14. No. 4. R. 303-312.   

Leontief W.W. (1947). Introduction to a Theory of the Internal Structure of Functional Relationships // Econometrica. Vol. 15(4). R. 361-373.   

May K. (1946a). The Aggregation Problem for a One-Industry Model // E^^me^^a. Vol. 14. № 4. R. 285-298.      

May K. (1946b). Technological Change and Aggregation // E^^me^^a. Vol. 15. No. 1. R. 51-63.  

Pu S.S. (1946). A Note on Macroeconomics // Econometrica. Vol. 14. No. 4. R. 299-302.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate