Везде
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSAL START FROM
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSAL START FROM
Annotation
PII
S0373-658X0000392-4-1
DOI
10.31857/SX0000392-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sandra Birzer 
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
69-84
Abstract
At the synchronous level, a linguistic unit, deviating from, is a form that oscillates between the functions of a participle and a preposition, which has not yet finally passed into the category of prepositions, although it has gone through a number of stages along this path: the main semantic change is the weathering of the sem, including the seme 'moving'; as a result, departing from in the prepositional function indicates the place. At the level of syntax, one should highlight the loss of coreference, which the subject of the participle in relation to the subject of the main part of the sentence, and the syntactic reinterpretation should be highlighted. The specialization of suffixes leads to the distinction between prepositional (deviating from) and adverbial (deviating) forms. A description of the way of grammaticalization of adjectives is offered.
Keywords
grammaticalization, gerunds, prepositions, Russian
Number of purchasers
1
Views
474
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Apresyan 1995 – YU.D. Apresyan. Leksicheskaya semantika. Sinonimicheskie sredstva yazyka. (Izbrannye trudy. T. I). M., 1995.
Babaeva 2006 – E.E. Babaeva. Formirovanie semanticheskoj struktury slova prostoj v russkom yazyke // YU.D. Apresyan (red.). YAzykovaya kartina mira i sistemnaya leksikografiya M., 2006.
BTS 1998 – Bol'shoj tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka. SPb., 1998.
Nedyalkov, YAhontov 1983 – V.P. Nedyalkov, S.E. YAhontov. Tipologiya rezul'tativnyh konstrukcij. // V.P. Nedyalkov (red.). Tipologiya rezul'tativnyh konstrukcij (rezul'tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt). L., 1983.
Plungyan 2003 – V.A. Plungyan. Obshchaya morfologiya. Vvedenie v problematiku. M., 2003.
CHerkasova 1967 – E.T. CHerkasova. Perekhod polnoznachnyh slov v predlogi. M., 1967.
Birzer 2008 – S. Birzer. The development of deconverbal prepositions: reanalysis or grammaticalization? // E. Vajda (ed.) Subordination and coordination strategies in North Asian languages. Amsterdam, 2008.
Birzer 2010 – S. Birzer. Russkoe deeprichastie: processy grammatikalizacii i leksikalizacii. (Slavolinguistica. 11). München, 2010.
Haspelmath 1998 – M. Haspelmath. Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? // Studies in language. 1998. 22, 2.
König, Kortmann 1991 – E. König, B. Kortmann. On the reanalysis of verbs as prepositions // G. Rauh (ed.). Approaches to prepositions. Tübingen, 1991.
Kortmann 1992 – B. Kortmann. Reanalysis completed and in progress: Participles as source of prepositions and conjunctions // D. Kellermann, M. Morissey (eds.). Diachrony within synchrony: Language history and cognition. Papers from the International symposium at the University of Duisburg, 26–28 March 1990. Frankfurt-am-Main, 1992.
Lehmann 2002 – Ch. Lehmann.Thoughts on grammaticalization. Erfurt, 2002. http://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-2058/ASSidUE09.pdf
Lehmann 2004 – Ch. Lehmann. Theory and method in grammaticalization // Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 2004. 32:2.
Rospond 1971 – S. Rospond. Gramatyka historyczna języka polskiego. Warszawa, 1971.
Van Valin 2005 – R. Van Valin. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambrigde, 2005.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate