Везде
RUSSIAN SYNTHETIC PERFECTIVE PASSIVE IN SJA: WHY IS IT (ALMOST) ABSENT?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
RUSSIAN SYNTHETIC PERFECTIVE PASSIVE IN SJA: WHY IS IT (ALMOST) ABSENT?
Annotation
PII
S0373-658X0000392-4-1
DOI
10.31857/SX0000392-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
G Zeldovich 
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
3-36
Abstract
The question is considered why constructions of type * are anomalous. The book was written by Ivan. It is shown that a perfect form would have here a perfect meaning 'for the speaker it is important what result of the action takes place at the moment of speech (or other reference moment)'. The perfect meaning can appear in two varieties: “standard”, of the form “there is a book at the moment of speech”, and subject-oriented, “in connection with the action at the moment of speech, the individuality of the subject is important”, and for constructions of the type under consideration, the latter is much more likely. A passive by its nature requires that with the help of a corresponding “subjectless” sentence (like the Book was being written) it is possible to name the same situation as with the help of a sentence where the subject is explicit (the Book was written by Ivan). If perfection is subject-oriented, then, omitting the subject, it is impossible to name the same situation. As a result, a conflict arises between the nature of the passive voice and the characteristics of the perfect perfect species, which is responsible for the anomaly.
Keywords
Aspect passive reflexive Russian language perfect sy-verbs
Number of purchasers
2
Views
533
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Apresyan 2004 – YU.D. Apresyan. Principy organizacii centra i periferii v leksike i grammatike // Tipologicheskie obosnovaniya v grammatike. M., 2004.
Boguslavskij 1985 – I.M. Boguslavskij. Issledovaniya po sintaksicheskoj semantike. M., 1985.
Grajs 1985 – P. Grajs. Logika i rechevoe obshchenie // Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVI. M., 1985.
Zel'dovich 1998 – G.M. Zel'dovich. Russkie vremennye kvantifikatory // Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. Sbd. 46. 1998.
Zel'dovich 1999 – G.M. Zel'dovich. O tipologii kvantifikatorov // IAN SLYA. 1999. T. 58. № 5–6.
Zel'dovich 2002a – G.M. Zel'dovich. Semantika i pragmatika sovershennogo vida // VYA. 2002. № 4.

Zel'dovich 2002b – G.M. Zel'dovich. Russkij vid: Semantika i pragmatika. Toruń, 2002.
Zel'dovich 2005 – G.M. Zel'dovich. Russkoe predikativnoe imya. Toruń, 2005.
Zel'dovich 2007 – G.M. Zel'dovich. Stradatel'nyj zalog i shkala agentivnosti // Glottodydaktyka i jej konteksty interkulturowe. Warszawa, 2006.
Zel'dovich 2009 (rkp.) – G.M. Zel'dovich. Pochemu russkie glagoly byvayut dvuvidovymi? (rukopis').
Maslov 1983 — YU.S. Maslov. Rezul'tativ, perfekt i glagol'nyj vid // Tipologiya rezul'tativnyh konstrukcij. L., 1983.
Mel'chuk 2004 — I.A. Mel'chuk. Opredelenie kategorii zaloga i ischislenie vozmozhnyh zalogov // 40 let Sankt-Peterburgskoj tipologicheskoj shkole. M., 2004.
Paducheva 1996 – E.V. Paducheva. Semanticheskie issledovaniya. Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke. Semantika narrativa. M., 1996.
Paducheva 2001 – E.V. Paducheva. Kauzativnye glagoly i dekauzativy v russkom yazyke // Russkij yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii. 2001. № 1.
Paducheva 2004 – E.V. Paducheva. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki. M., 2004.
Percov 2003 – N.V. Percov. Vozvratnye stradatel'nye formy russkogo glagola v svyazi s problemoj sushchestvovaniya v morfologii // VYA. 2003. № 4.
Sibatani 1999 – M. Sibatani. Perekhodnost' i zalog v svete faktov yaponskogo yazyka // Tipologiya i teoriya yazyka. Ot opisaniya k ob"yasneniyu. M., 1999.
Hrakovskij 2004 – V.S. Hrakovskij. Koncepciya diatez i zalogov // 40 let Sankt-Peterburgskoj tipologicheskoj shkole. M., 2004.
Arce-Arenales, Axelrod, Fox 1994 – M. Arce-Arenales, M. Axelrod, B. Fox. Active voice and middle diathesis // B. Fox, P. Hopper (eds.). Voice. Form and function. Amsterdam, 1994.
Ariel 2002 – M. Ariel. Privileged interactional interpretations // Journal of pragmatics. 2002. V. 34. № 8.
Blevins 2003 – J. Blevins. Passives and impersonals // Journal of linguistics. 2003. V. 39. № 3.
Bogusławski 1977 – A. Bogusławski. Problems of the thematic-rhematic structure of sentences. Warszawa, 1977.
Carston 2002 – R. Carston. Thoughts and utterances. The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford, 2002.
Comrie 1977 – B. Comrie. In defense of spontaneous demotion: The impersonal passive // P. Cole, J.M. Sadock (eds.). Syntax and semantics. V. 8. New York, etc., 1977.
Comrie 1982 – B. Comrie. Grammatical relations in Huichol // P. Hopper, S. Thompson (eds.). Studies in transitivity. Syntax and semantics. V. 15. New York, etc., 1982.
Croft 1994 – W. Croft. Voice: beyond control and affectedness // P. Hopper, B. Fox (eds.). Voice: Form and function. Amsterdam, 1994.
Dowty 1991 – D. Dowty. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection // Language. 1991. V. 67. № 3.
Ducrot 1980 – O. Ducrot. Les échelles argumentatives. Paris, 1980.
Gerritsen 1990 – N. Gerritsen. Russian refl exive verbs: In search of unity in diversity (Studies in Slavic and general linguistics. 15). Amsterdam; Atlanta, 1990.
Givón 1982 – T. Givón. Transitivity, topicality, and the Ute impersonal passive // P. Hopper, S. Thompson (eds.). Studies in transitivity. Syntax and semantics. V. 15. New York, etc., 1982.
Givón 1984 – T. Givón. Direct object and dative shifting: Semantic and pragmatic case // F. Plank (ed.). Objects. London, 1984.
Grimshaw 1990 – J. Grimshaw. Argument structure. MIT Press, 1990.
Haig 1982 – H. Haig. Passivization in modern Western Armenian // P. Hopper, S. Thompson (eds.). Studies in transitivity. Syntax and semantics. V. 15. New York, etc., 1982.
Hopper, Thompson 1980 – P. Hopper, S. Thompson. Transitivity in grammar and discourse // Language. 1980. V. 56. № 2.
Horn 1985 – L. Horn. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity // Language. 1985. V. 61. № 1.

Israeli 1997 – A. Israeli. Semantics and pragmatics of the «Refl exive» verbs in Russian. München, 1997.
Jaeger 2001 – G. Jaeger. Topic-comment structure and the contrast between stage level and individual level predicates // Journal of semantics. 2001. V. 18. № 2.
Levinson 2000 – S. Levinson. Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, 2000.
Matsumoto 1995 – Y. Matsumoto. The conversational condition on Horn scales // Linguistics and philosophy. 1995. V. 18. № 1.
McCawley 1978 – J. McCawley. Conversational implicature and the lexicon // Syntax and semantics. V. 9. Pragmatics. New York, etc., 1978.
Moravčsik 1991 – J. Moravčsik. ‘All A’s are B’s’: Form and content // Journal of pragmatics. 16. 1991.
Noonan 1994 – M. Noonan. A tale of two passives in Irish // B. Fox, P. Hopper (eds.). Voice. Form and function. Amsterdam, 1994.
Rad. pragm. 1981 – P. Cole (ed.). Radical pragmatics. New York, 1981.
Saul 2002 – J.M. Saul. What is said and psychological reality // Linguistics and philosophy. 2002. V. 25.
Shibatani 1985 – M. Shibatani. Passive and related constructions: A prototype analysis // Language. 1985. V. 61. № 4.
Siewierska 1984 – A. Siewierska. The passive. London, 1984.
Siewierska 2005 – A. Siewierska. Passive constructions // M. Haspelmath, M.S. Dryer, D. Gil, B. Comrie (eds.). World atlas of language structure. Oxford, 2005.
Wierzbicka 1985 – A. Wierzbicka. Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor, 1985.
Yokoyama 1986 – O. Yokoyama. Discourse and word order. Amsterdam, 1986.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate