Везде
FEATURES OF SOCIAL CONTROL OF DEVIANCE: GENERAL AND SPECIFIC (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE INTERNET PROJECT "PICKUP")
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
FEATURES OF SOCIAL CONTROL OF DEVIANCE: GENERAL AND SPECIFIC (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE INTERNET PROJECT "PICKUP")
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000531-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Tatiana Shipunova 
Edition
Volume 368 Issue 12
Pages
127-136
Abstract
The author examines the content of social control of deviance, the role of virtual communications in the formation of the concepts of norm/deviation. The article presents the results of studying the process of promoting consumer values in intimate relationships between people in the Internet space when analyzing the forms and methods of promoting the social project "Pickup". The focus is on three elements of this process: self-presentation, product presentation, and the content of consumer discourse in the materials of the rmes website. Each of the elements is analyzed in detail, and their main characteristics are highlighted.
Keywords
Internet project, rmes pickup, brand representation, reputation building, consumer discourse, machismo
Date of publication
01.12.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
477
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Antonovskij A.Yu. Prostranstvo i vremya kommunikatsii i soznaniya: Burd'e vs. Luman // Kommunikativnaya ratsional'nost': ehpistemologicheskij podkhod. M., 2009.


Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. SPb., 2008.


Belousov A. Upravlenie kommunikatsiej. Kriticheskie zamechaniya k teorii kommunikatsii // URL: http://www.dzyalosh.ru/01-comm/statii/upravlenie-koomunik.htm (data obrascheniya: 20.10.2011).


Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. M., 1995.


Bifurkatsiya // Filosofskij slovar'. URL: http://mirslovarei.com/content_fil/bifurkacija-6420.html(data obrascheniya: 20.10.2012).


Bogachev F. Russkaya model' ehffektivnogo soblazneniya. M., 2005.


Bodrijyar Zh. Sistema veschej. M., 2001.


Burd'e P. Sotsiologiya sotsial'nogo prostranstva / Per. s fr.; otv. red. perevoda N.A. Shmatko. M., 2007.


Gendernoe nasilie — opredelenie. URL: http://www.feminisnts.ru/3477-gendernoe-nasilie-opredelenie.html (data obrascheniya: 20.10.2013).


Giddens Eh. Ustroenie obschestva. Ocherk teorii strukturatsii. M., 2003.


Gilinskij Ya. Deviantologiya: sotsiologiya prestupnosti, narkotizma, prostitutsii, samoubijstv i drugikh “otklonenij”. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. SPb., 2007.


Debor G. Obschestvo spektaklya / Per. s fr. C. Ofertasa i M. Yakubovich. M., 1999.


Liotar Zh.-F. Sostoyanie postmoderna. SPb., 1998.


Masionis Dzh. Sotsiologiya. 9-e izd. SPb., 2004.


Machizm // URL: http://vocabulary.ru/dictionary/666/word/machizm (data obrascheniya: 20.10.2013).


Modulyator. URL: http://slovari.yandex.ru/modulyator%20-%20ehto/BSEh/Modulyator/ (data obrascheniya: 12.11.2011).


Modulyator. URL: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulyator (data obrascheniya: 22.11.2012).


Pocheptsov G. Teoriya kommunikatsii. M., 2001.


RMEhS: Russkaya model' ehffektivnogo soblaznenieya // URL: http://www.rmes.ru/rmes/about/ (data obrascheniya: 25.10.2013).


Tul'chinskij G.L. Novaya antropologiya (personologiya): Samozvanstvo ili lichnost' kak avtoproekt? // Neva. 2010. № 6.


Tul'chinskij G.L. Postchelovecheskaya personologiya. Novye perspektivy svobody i ratsional'nosti. SPb., 2002.


Sheli Dzh. Kriminologiya. SPb., 2003.


Shipunova T.V. Deviantologiya: sovremennye teoertiko-metodologicheskie problemy. SPb., 2012.


Shipunova T.V. Makro-mikro-makro-model' sotsial'nogo kontrolya deviantnosti v konstruktivistskoj perspektive: priglashenie k diskussii // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2012. № 2(61). C. 157–173.


Shipunova T.V. Prodvizhenie deviantnykh obraztsov povedeniya kak (a)sotsial'nykh proektov v virtual'noj kommunikativnoj srede // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2013. № 3(68). C. 138–153.


Habermas J. Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”. Frankfurt a/M., 1968.


Lamnek S. Theorien abweichenden Verhaltens: eine Einfürung für Soziologie, Psychologie, Pädagogen, Juristen, Politologen, Kommunikationwissenschaftler und Sozialarbeiter. 7. Auff. München, 2001.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate