PARTICIPATION OF RUSSIAN EMPLOYEES IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN COMPANIES
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
PARTICIPATION OF RUSSIAN EMPLOYEES IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN COMPANIES
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000527-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
41-50
Abstract
The results of a comparative analysis of the participation of Russian employees of companies with domestic and foreign capital in the process of preparing and discussing management decisions are presented. The problem of interaction of cultures with high and low power distance within the same organization is raised. The conclusion is made about the "background" influence of the Russian culture with a high power distance, which is manifested in low absolute indicators of involvement of Russian employees in management. In companies with foreign participation, there is a phenomenon of "importing" culture with a low power distance, this is manifested in a relatively large scale of participation, higher motivation and individual activity of their employees in the preparation and adoption of management decisions and the perception of their organizations as more "democratic".
Keywords
employee participation in management, power distance, participatory management, Russian and foreign companies, authoritarianism and democracy in the organization
Date of publication
01.12.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
535
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Balabanova E.S. Osobennosti rossijskoj ehkonomicheskoj mental'nosti // Mir Rossii: Sotsiologiya, ehtnologiya. 2001. T. 10. № 3. S. 67–77.

Il'in V. Chlenskie organizatsii: bumazhnyj i real'nyj status. Rezhim dostupa: web.warwick.ac.uk/russia/Intas/Rusilyin3.doc (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2014).

Kozina I.M. Zabastovki v sovremennoj Rossii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 9. S. 13–24.

Kozina I.M. Sotsial'no-trudovye otnosheniya na predpriyatiyakh: vozmozhnosti otsenki // XI mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ehkonomiki i obschestva: V 3-kh kn. Kn. 2. / Otv. red.: E.G. Yasin. M.: NIU VShEh, 2011. S. 367–375.

Klyuchko V.N. Uchastie rabotnikov v upravlenii predpriyatiyami. Rossijskij opyt i perspektivy // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2007. № 1. S. 119–131.

Lebedeva N.M. Tsennosti kul'tury, ehkonomicheskie ustanovki i otnoshenie k innovatsiyam v Rossii // Psikhologiya: Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2008. T. 5. № 2. S. 68–88.

Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Kul'tura kak faktor obschestvennogo progressa. M.: Yustitsinform, 2009.

Maksimov B.I. Rabochie v period reform: polozhenie, orientatsiya, kollektivnye dejstviya // Mir Rossii. 2002. № 3. S. 96–121.

Ehfendiev A.G., Balabanova E.S. Uchastie rabotnikov v upravlenii rossijskikh biznes-organizatsij // Sovremennyj menedzhment: problemy, gipotezy, issledovaniya: sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 2. M.: GU-VShEh, 2010. S. 339–366.

Ehfendiev A.G., Balabanova E.S. «Chelovecheskoe izmerenie» rossijskogo biznesa: k demokraticheski-gumanisticheskomu tipu sotsial'noj organizatsii firmy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 7. S. 43–54.

Bryson A., Gomez R., Kretschmer T., Willman P. The diffusion of workplace voice and high commitment management practices in Britain, 1984–1998 // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2007. Vol. 16. № 3. P. 395–426.

Cregan C., Brown M. The influence of union membership status on workers’ willingness to participate in joint consultation // Human Relations. 2010. Vol. 63. № 3. P. 331–348.

Dachler H.P., Wilpert B. Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1978. Vol. 23. № 1. P. 1–39.

De Bruin W.B., Parker A.M., Fischoff B. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007. Vol. 92. № 5. P. 938–956.

Driscoll J.W. Trust and Participation in Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction // Academy of Management Journal. 1978. Vol. 21. № 1. P. 44–56.

Gallie D. Direct Participation and the Quality of Work // Human Relations. 2013. Vol. 66. № 4. P. 453–473.

Greenberg E.S. The consequences of worker participation: A clarification of the theoretical literature // Social Science Quarterly. 1975. Vol. 56. № 2. P. 191–209.

Hackman J., Oldham G. The Job Diagnostic Survey. New Haven: Yale University, 1974.

Heller F.A., Pusic E., Strauss G., Wilpert B. Organizational participation: Myth and reality. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills CA: Sage, 1980.

Huselid M.A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance // Academy of Management Journal. 1995. Vol. 38. № 3. P. 635–672.

Inglehart R., Baker W.E. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values // American Sociological Review. 2000. Vol. 65. № 1. P. 19–51.

Knudsen H., Busck O., Lind J. Work environment quality: The role of workplace participation and democracy // Work, Employment and Society. 2011. Vol. 25. № 3. P. 379–396.

Ledford G.E., Lawler E.E. Research on employee participation: Beating a dead horse? // Academy of Management Review. 1994. Vol. 19. № 4. P. 633–636.

Marchington M., Goodman J., Wilkinson A., Ackers P. New Developments in Employee Involvement. Manchester: Manchester School of Management, 1992.

Marchington M., Wilkinson A. Direct Participation and Involvement // Managing Human Resources: Personnel Management in Transition / Ed. S. Bach. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.

Miller K.I., Monge P.R. Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review // Academy of Management Journal. 1986. Vol. 29. № 4. P. 727–753.

Millward N., Bryson A., Forth J. All change at work? British employment relations 1980–1998. Portrayed by the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey Series. L.: Routledge, 2000.

Piasna A., Smith M., Rose J., Rubery J., Burchell B., Rafferty A. Participatory HRM practices and job quality of vulnerable workers // International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2013. Vol. 24. № 22. P. 4094–4115.

Probst T.M. Countering the Negative Effects of Job Insecurity through Participative Decision-making: Lessons from the Demand–Control Model // Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2005. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 320–329.

Rodgers R., Hunter J.E. A component process theorem of job satisfaction // International Journal of Human Resource Management. 1993. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 425–442.

Sagie, A., Aycan Z. A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Participative Decision-Making in Organizations // Human Relations. 2003. Vol. 56. № 4. P. 453–473.

Somech A. Explicating the Complexity of Participative Management: An Investigation of Multiple Dimensions // Educational Administration Quarterly. 2002. Vol. 38. № 3. P. 341–371.

Smylie M.A., Lazarus V., Brownlee-Conyers J. Instructional Outcomes of School-Based Participative Decision Making // Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1996. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 181–198.

Spreitzer G.M., Mishra A.K. Giving Up Control Without Losing Control: Effects on Managers’ Involving Employees in Decision Making // Group and Organization Management. 1999. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 155–187.

Tomer J. Understanding High Performance Work Systems: The Joint Contribution of Economics and Human Resource Management // Journal of Socio-Economics. 2001. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 63–73.

Vries G., Jhen K., Terwel B. When employees stop talking and start fighting: the detrimental effects of pseudo voice in organization // Journal of Business Ethics. 2012. Vol. 105. № 2. P. 221–230.

Wood S.J., Wall T.D. Work enrichment and employee voice in human resource management-performance studies // International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2007. Vol. 18. № 7. P. 1335–1372.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate