Везде
WHO IS TO BLAME: CONTENT ANALYSIS OF BLOGS ABOUT THE TERRORIST ATTACK IN DOMODEDOVO"
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
WHO IS TO BLAME: CONTENT ANALYSIS OF BLOGS ABOUT THE TERRORIST ATTACK IN DOMODEDOVO"
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000527-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Kirill Gavrilov  Alexander Tolmach
Edition
Volume 368 Issue 12
Pages
81-88
Abstract
The results of content analysis of messages related to the terrorist attack at Domodedovo airport are presented. It is stated that the media play a significantrole as a source of factual, non-evaluative information. Theoretical value of the results: a significant number of cases have been identified when an actor is accused without indicating an action or omission. The distinction between the types of involvement in terrorist attacks was significant.
Keywords
social media, blogs, terrorism, terrorist threat, risk sociology, risk perception, attribution of responsibility and guilt
Date of publication
01.12.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
458
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Abramov R.N. Chto takoe nostal'giya. Puteshestvie po rossijskoj blogosfere // 60 parallel'. Nekommercheskoe izdanie po kul'turnoj politike. 2009. S. 36–41.


Abramov R.N. Metodologicheskie i soderzhatel'nye aspekty sotsial'nykh issledovanij blogov: analiticheskij obzor // Sotsiologiya: 4M. 2012. № 35. S. 90–118.


Bataeva E.V. Ehtnometodologicheskij analiz onlajn-kommunikatsij: krizisnyj ehksperiment v chatakh // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 12. S. 88–98.


Gavrilov K.A., Tolmach A.D. Obydennoe pripisyvanie otvetstvennosti v situatsii terakta: opyt vydeleniya kategorij vinovnykh aktorov dlya kontent-analiza // Sotsiologiya: 4M. 2012. № 35. S. 119–154.


Davydov A. A. Sotsiologiya izuchaet blogosferu // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008. № 11. S. 92–101.


Devyatko I.F. O teoreticheskikh modelyakh, ob'yasnyayuschikh vospriyatie spravedlivosti na mikro-, mezo- i makrourovnyakh sotsial'noj real'nosti // Sotsiologiya: 4M. 2009. № 29. S. 10–29.


Devyatko I.F. Ot intentsional'nosti k otvetstvennosti/vinovnosti (ili naoborot?): rezul'taty i perspektivy issledovaniya obydennykh teorij dejstviya // Sotsiologiya i obschestvo: global'nye vyzovy i regional'noe razvitie: Materialy IV


Ocherednogo Vserossijskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa / ROS, IS RAN, AN RB, ISPPI. M.: ROS, 2012. S. 46–53.


Duglas M. Okruzhayuschaya sreda i risk // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2007. Tom 6. № 3. S. 37–48.


Kol'tsova O.Yu., Maslinskij K.A. Vyyavlenie tematicheskoj struktury rossijskoj blogosfery: avtomaticheskie metody analiza tekstov // Sotsiologiya: 4M. 2013. № 36. S. 113–138.


Kuz'mina (Starkova) E.V. Soobschestva v Zhivom zhurnale – novye kommunikativnye vozmozhnosti dlya subkul'turnykh grupp i obschestvennykh initsiativ // Zhurnal issledovanij sotsial'noj politiki. 2011. Tom 9. № 3. S. 365–390.


O servise IQBuzz. URL: http://www.iqbuzz.ru/about.php (Data obrascheniya: 27.05.2012).


Rittser Dzh. Sovremennye sotsiologicheskie teorii (5-e izdanie). Moskva i dr.: Piter, 2002.


Rygajs E.V. Religioznye vzglyady v virtual'noj real'nosti (na primere tekstov sotsial'noj seti vkontakte.ru) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 6. S. 115–120.


Semyonova A.V., Korsunskaya M.V. Kontent-analiz SMI: problemy i opyt primeneniya. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 2010.


Tolmach A.D. Fenomen terrorizma v massovom soznanii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 4. S. 82–88.


Fomicheva I. D. Sotsiologiya SMI. M.: Aspekt Press, 2007.


Ehtling B., Aleksanyan K., Kelli Dzh., Faris R., Palfri Dzh., Gasser U. Publichnyj diskurs v rossijskoj blogosfere: analiz politiki i mobilizatsii v Runete. 2010. URL: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_BlogosphereRUSSIAN.pdf (data obrascheniya: 25.11.2012).


Bachnik W., Szymczyk S., Leszczynski P., Podsiadlo R., Rymszewicz E., Kurylo L., Makowiec D., Bykowska B. Quantitive and sociological analysis of blog networks // Acta Physica Polonica B Vol. 36. № 10. 2005.


Bennett J. Positive and Negative Relevance // American Philosophical Quarterly. 1983. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 185–194.


Burns W. Risk Perception: A Review. Create report. University of Southern California. Los Angeles, CA, 2007. URL: http://create.usc.edu/research/54570.pdf (date of access: 25.12.2013).


Lagnado D.A., Channon S. Judgements of cause and blame // Cognition. 2008. Vol. 108. P. 754–770.


Leskovec J., McGlohon M., Faloutsos Ch., Glance N., Hurst M. Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs. Patterns and a model. 2007. URL: http://cs.stanford.edu/people/jure/pubs/blogs-sdm07.pdf(date of access: 25.11.2012).


Lickel B., Schmader T., Hamilton D. A Case of Collective Responsibility: Who Else Was to Blame for the Columbine High School Shootings? // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003. Vol. 29. P. 194–204.


Mumpower L., Shi L., Stoutenborough J., Vedlitz A. Psychometric and Demographic Predictors of the Perceived Risk of Terrorist Threats and theWillingness to Pay for Terrorism Risk Management Programs // Risk Analysis. 2013. Vol. 33. № 10. P. 1802–1811.


Sjöberg L. The Perceived Risk of Terrorism // Risk Management. 2005. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 43–61.


Slovic P. Terrorism as hazard: A new species of trouble // Risk Analysis. 2002. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 425–426.


Spranca M., Minsk E., Baron J. Omission and commission in judgment and choice // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1991. Vol. 27. Iss. 1. P. 76–105.


Zhou X. The political blogosphere in China: A content analysis of the blogs regarding the dismissal of Shanghai leader Chen Liangyu // New Media & Society. 2009. Vol. 11. № 6. URL: http://nms.sagepub.com/content/11/6/1003.short (date of access: 25.11.2012).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate