References

Additional sources and materials

Bahtin M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. M.: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1979.
Gryaznova Yu. B., Rac M. V. Kak nam chitat'? // Voprosy psiholingvistiki. 2008. N 8. S. 142 - 146.
Olejnik A. N. Triangulyaciya v kontent-analize: voprosy metodologii i empiricheskaya proverka // Sociol. issled. 2009. N 2.
Benjamin R.G. Reconstructing Readability: Recent Developments and Recommendations
in the Analysis of Text Difficulty // Educational Psychology Review. 2011. Vol. 24. Iss. 1. P. 63 - 88.
Bourdieu P. Homo academicus. Paris: Ed. de Minuit, 1984.
Goldgar A. Impolite Learning: Conduct and Community in the Republic of Letters. 1680 - 1750. Hew Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1995.
Hartley J. Reading and Writing Book Reviews Across Disciplines // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006. Vol. 57. N 9. P. 1194 - 1207.
Hartley J., Sotto E., Fox C. Clarity across the Disciplines: An Analysis of Texts in the
Sciences, Social Sciences, and Arts and Humanities // Science Communication. 2004. Vol. 26. N 2. P. 188 - 210.
Harwood N. An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines // Journal of Pragmatics. 2009. Vol. 41. Iss. 3. P. 497 - 518.
Hirschauer S. Editorial Judgments: A Praxeology of \'Voting\' in Peer Review // Social Studies of Science. 2010. Vol. 40. N1. P. 71 - 103.
Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2004 [2000].