Везде
INSTITUTIONAL THEORY OF ANOMIE – EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
INSTITUTIONAL THEORY OF ANOMIE – EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000375-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Zigmunt  Peter Vettsels
Edition
Volume 372 Issue 4
Pages
78-87
Abstract
Institutional theory of anomie (ITA) – theoretical basis explanations of crime in the situation of dominance of certain social groups institutions (economy, political system – to the detriment of the institutions of the family, school, peer groups). ITA verification should BE based on data in addition to statisticsquantitative surveys. Due to accessibility, students are larger than other groups they are suitable for such research. ITA verification is possible on the material of companies with a similar institutional structure and differences in the speed of public changes (East and West Germany) and societies with rapid changes and differences in institutional structure (East Germany and Russia). The concept of empirical research of institutional theory is presented anomalies.
Keywords
institutional theory of anomie, empirical research, juvenile delinquency, Russia, Germany
Date of publication
01.04.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
415
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Belyaeva L.A. Sotsial'nye sloi v Rossii: opyt klasternogo analiza // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 12. S. 57–64.


Volkov V.V. Tsennosti i normy nelegal'nykh silovykh struktur // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 1999. № 3 (2). S. 78–86.


Gilinskij Ya.I. Kriminologiya: Teoriya, istoriya, ehmpiricheskaya baza, sotsial'nyj kontrol'. Kurs lektsij. SPb.: Piter, 2002.


Gilinskij Ya.I. “Prestuplenie i nakazanie” nesovershennoletnikh pravonarushitelej: Mneniya naseleniya i ehkspertov. SPb.: Tsentr nezavisimykh sotsiologicheskikh issledovanij, 2004.


Gilinskij Ya.I., Avrutin D.S., Afanas'ev V.S. i dr. Izuchenie sostoyaniya i prichin negativnykh yavlenij sredi uchaschikhsya shkol i PTU Leningrada i razrabotka tselevoj kompleksnoj programmy ikh preduprezhdeniya. L.: Sovetskaya


Sotsiologicheskaya Assotsiatsiya Akademii Nauk SSSR (Severo-Zapadnoe otdelenie), Leningradskij Sotsiologicheskij Nauchno-Issledovatel'skij Tsentr, 1989. (Pis'mennyj otchet, ne opublikovan).


Gilinskij Ya., Kochetkov Eh., Podkolzin V. Problemy narkotikov v Sankt-Peterburge / Peterburg nachala 90-kh: bezumnyj, kholodnyj, zhestokij... SPb.: Blagotvoritel'nyj fond “Nochlezhka”, 1994. S. 96–101, 218–222.


Zigmunt O.A. Prestupniki i poterpevshie ot nasil'stvennykh prestuplenij: issledovanie latentnoj prestupnosti nesovershennoletnikh // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika. 2013. № 1(23). S. 106–116.


Zigmunt O.A., Ehntsmann D. Razlichiya i osobennosti prestupnosti nesovershennoletnikh v Rossii i Germanii: ikh znachimost' dlya teorii anomii // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2006. № 1 (10). S. 97–109.


Zigmunt O., Ehntsmann D., Vettsel's P. Registratsiya sovershennykh prestuplenij: ehlement kontrolya prestupnosti nesovershennoletnikh / Obschestvo i prestupnost' nesovershennoletnikh. SPb.: TsNSI. 2007. S. 33–47.


Lapin N.I. Modernizatsiya bazovykh tsennostej rossiyan // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1996. № 5. S. 3–23.


Maksimenko A.A. Kak rossijskaya molodezh' namerena “delat'” den'gi // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 7. S. 131–133.


Tsvetaeva N.N. Tsennosti v biograficheskom diskurse: ot romantizma k pragmatizmu // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 9. S. 116–122.


Muftić L.R. Advancing institutional anomy theory: A microlevel examination connecting culture, institutions, and deviance // International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2006. № 50. Р. 630–653.


Piquero A., Piquero N.L. On testing institutional anomie theory with varying specifications // Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention. 1998. № 7. Р. 61–84.


Rosenfeld R., Messner S.F. Markets, mortality, and an institutional-anomie theory of crime // N. Passas, R. Agnew (еds.). The future of anomie theory (p. 207–224). Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1997.


Siegmunt O. Kriminelle Russen, kriminelle Deutsche: Zur Jugendkriminalität im Hell- und Dunkelfeld. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher, 2013.


Sturzbecher D. (Hrsg.) Jugend und Gewalt in Ostdeutschland: Lebenserfahrungen in Schule, Freizeit und Familie. Gӧttingen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie, 1997.


Thorlindsson T., Bernburg G. Durkheim’s theory of social order and deviance: a multi-level test // European Sociological Review. 2004. № 20. Р. 271–285.


Weigel R.H., Hessing D.J., Elffers H. Egoism: concept, measurement and implications for deviance // Psychology, Crime & Law. 1999. № 5. Р. 349–378.


Wetzels P. Kriminalität und Opferleben: Immer ӧfter immer das Gleiche? Defizite und Perspektiven repräsentativer Opferbefragungen als Methode empirisch-viktimologischer Forschung in Kriminologie // Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform. 1996. № 79. Р. 1–24.


Wetzels P., Enzmann D. Jugendkriminalität in Deutschland und Russland: Kulturvergleichende Dunkelfeldstudie zur Prüfung anomie- und kontrolltheoretischer Ansätze. Antrag auf Gewährung einer Sachbeihilfe an die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (unverӧffentlichtes Manuskript), 2007.


Wetzels P., Enzmann D., Mecklenburg E., Pfeiffer C. Jugend und Gewalt: Eine repräsentative Dunkelfeldanalyse in München und acht anderen Städten. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate