RAS History & PhilologyЭтнографическое обозрение Ethno review

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-5415
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6274

Conserving the “Left Bank”: Authorized Heritage Discourse in the Romanov Part of Tutaev

PII
S30346274S0869541525020027-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034627425020027
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 2
Pages
11-34
Abstract
The article is based on anthropological research conducted in 2019-2024 in Tutaev (Yaroslavl region, Russia) and discusses the active life of heritage in the left-bank (Romanov) part of the town in the recent years. Laurajane Smith’s concept of authorized heritage discourse (AHD) is used as a theoretical framework for the analysis. Focusing on the issue of borders between different actors, I examine the possibilities and limitations of the concept. The study draws on the materials of participant observation, local social networks, and interviews with town residents - particularly, heritage preservation activists. I argue that, on the one hand, the use of the AHD concept helps identify the complexity of the heritage landscape in the case under consideration and discern non-obvious drawbacks and conventions in this area. On the other hand, the study shows that Smith’s concept is not sensitive enough to the nuances and differences revealed during fieldwork and needs more subtle analytical tools.
Keywords
наследие исследования наследия локальность авторизованный дискурс наследия Тутаев
Date of publication
01.02.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
32

References

  1. 1. Аверкиева К.В. Сельская джентрификация: горожане в сельской местности российского Нечерноземья // Крестьяноведение. 2023. Т. 8. № 4. С. 137-151. https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2023-8-4-137-151
  2. 2. Колесник А.С., Русанов А.В. Наследие-как-процесс: дискуссии о концепте культурного наследия в современных социальных и гуманитарных науках // Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: История. 2022. Т. 58. № 3. С. 58-69. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2022-3-58-69
  3. 3. Bailoni M., Edelblutte S., Tchékémian A. Agricultural Landscapes, Heritage and Identity in Peri-Urban Areas in Western Europe // European Countryside. 2012. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 154. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0020-9
  4. 4. Schofield J. (ed.) Who Needs Experts? Counter-Mapping Cultural Heritage. L.: Routledge; Taylor and Francis Group, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315547251
  5. 5. Smith L. Uses of Heritage. L.: Routledge, 2006. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
  6. 6. Stiman M. Privileging Place: How Second Homeowners Transform Communities and Themselves. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691239972
  7. 7. Urry J. The Tourist Gaze: Leisure And Travel in Contemporary Societies. L.: Sage Publications, 1990.
  8. 8. Veschambre V. Autour du patrimoine: des enjeux d’ancrage spatial et de construction identitaire // Ces lieux qui nous habitent. Identites des territoires, territoires des identities / Dir. F. Guerin-Pace, E. Filippova. P.: L’Aube, 2008. P. 89.
  9. 9. Vonnak D. Review of: Who Needs Experts? Counter-Mapping Cultural Heritage / Ed. J. Schofield. Farnham, 2014 // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2016. Vol. 22. P. 442-444.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library