Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы
1. Военная доктрина Российской Федерации // Российская газета, 30.12.2014. [Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation // Rossiiskaya gazeta, 30.12.2014]. Available at: https://rg.ru/2014/12/30/doktrina-dok.html. (accessed 15.04.2016).
2. Корсаков Г.Б. Тенденции развития военной политики Вашингтона // США v Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2011, №2, с. 22-40. [Korsakov G.B. Major Trends of U.S. Military Policy // USA v Canada, 2011, No 2, p. 22-40].
3. Стратегия национальной безопасности Российской Федерации до 2020 года // Российская газета, 31.12.2015. [National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation 2020 // Rossiiskaya gazeta, 31.12.2015]. Available at: https://rg.ru/2015/12/31/nac-bezopasnost-site-dok.html. (accessed 15.04.2016).
4. Air-Sea Battle Office, Air-Sea Battle: Service Collaboration to Address Anti-Access and Area Denial Challenges. Washington: U.S. Department of Defense, May 2013.
5. America's Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Administration / Ed. by Fontaine R., Lord K. Washington: Center for a New American Security, 2012.
6. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Washington: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2015.
7. Bowie Ch. The Anti-Access Threat and Theater Air Bases. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2002.
8. Capstone Concept for Joint Operations: Joint Force 2020. Washington: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, 10.09.2012.
9. Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles / Ed. by Erickson A., Goldstein L. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2011.
10. The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles / Ed. by Saunders Ph. et al. Washington: National Defense University Press, 2011.
11. Cliff R. et al. Entering the Dragon’s Lair: Chinese Anti-Access Strategies and Their Implications for the United States. Santa Monica: RAND, 2007.
12. Cliff R. et al. Shaking the Heavens and Splitting the Earth: Chinese Air Force Employment Concepts in the 21st Century. Santa Monica: RAND, 2011.
13. Davis P., Wilson P. Looming Discontinuities in U.S. Military Strategy and Defense Planning: Colliding RMAs Necessitate a New Strategy. Santa Monica: RAND, 2011.
14. Defense Strategic Guidance. Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense. Washington: U.S. Department of Defense, January 2012.
15. The Department of Defense Arctic Strategy. Washington: U.S. Department of Defense, November 2013.
16. Dobbins J. War with China // Survival, August/September 2012, p. 7-24.
17. Easton I. The Great Game in Space: China’s Evolving ASAT Weapons Programs and Their Implications for Future U.S. Strategy. Washington: Project 2049 Institute, 2009.
18. Ehrhard Th., Work R. Range, Persistence, Stealth, and Networking: The Case for a Carrier-Based Unmanned Combat Air System. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2008.
19. Fact Sheet, Nuclear Weapons Employment Strategy of the United States. Washington: The White House, 19.06.2013.
20. Friedberg A. A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia. New York: W.W. Norton, 2011.
21. Gunzinger M., Dougherty Ch. Changing the Game: The Promise of Directed-Energy Weapons. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2012.
22. Gunzinger M. Shaping America’s Future Military: Toward a New Force Planning Construct. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2013.
23. Harrison T. The Future of MILSATCOM. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2013.
24. Joint Operations Access Concept. Washington: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, 17.01.2012.
25. Kissinger H. The Future of U.S.-Chinese Relations: Conflict Is a Choice, Not a Necessity // Foreign Affairs, March/April 2012, p. 44-55.
26. Krepinevich A., Watts B., Work R. Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2003.
27. Krepinevich A. Why Air-Sea Battle? Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2010.
28. Kroenig M. Facing Reality: Getting NATO Ready for a New Cold War // Survival, February/March 2015, p. 49-70.
29. Kroenig M. Time to Attack Iran: Why a Strike is the Least Bad Option // Foreign Affairs, January/February 2012, p. 76-86.
30. Legvold R. Managing the New Cold War: What Moscow and Washington Can Learn From the Last One // Foreign Affairs, July/August 2014, p. 74-84.
31. Miller M. U.S. Air Force Bomber Sustainment and Modernization. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 23.04.2013.
32. Montgomery E. Contested Primacy in the Western Pacific: China's Rise and the Future of U.S. Power Projection // International Security, Spring 2014, p. 115-149.
33. Morgan F. Deterrence and First-Strike Stability in Space: A Preliminary Assessment. Santa Monica: RAND, 2010.
34. The National Military Strategy of the United States of America. Washington: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, June 2015.
35. National Nuclear Security Administration, Fiscal Year 2015 Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan, Report to Congress. Washington: U.S. Department of Energy, April 2014.
36. National Security Strategy. Washington: The White House, February 2015.
37. National Strategy for the Arctic Region. Washington: The White House, May 2013.
38. Nuclear Weapons, GAO-11-387. Washington: U.S. Government Accountability Office, May 2011.
39. O'Hanlon M. Prudent or Paranoid? The Pentagon's Two-War Plans // Survival, Spring 2001, p. 37-52.
40. O'Hanlon M., Steinberg J. Going beyond "Air-Sea Battle" // The Washington Post, 24.08.2012.
41. O'Rourke R. Navy Ohio Replacement (SSBN [x]) Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress, Report for Congress R41129. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 18.10.2012.
42. O’Rourke R. Navy Virginia (SSN-774) Class Attack Submarine Procurement. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 27.09.2013.
43. Pettyjohn S. U.S. Global Defense Posture, 1783-2011. Santa Monica: RAND, 2012.
44. Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2014 to 2023. Washington: U.S. Congressional Budget Office, December 2013.
45. Quadrennial Defense Review. Washington: U.S. Department of Defense, 4.03.2014.
46. Ross R. China's Naval Nationalism: Sources, Prospects, and U.S. Response // International Security, Fall 2009, p. 54-60.
47. Tellis A. et al. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age. Santa Monica: RAND, 2000.
48. United States Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Request. Overview. Washington: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, February 2015.
49. Watts B. The Maturing Revolution in Military Affairs. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2011.
Комментарии
Сообщения не найдены