Везде
Knowledge and Reality in the Historical Epistemology
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Knowledge and Reality in the Historical Epistemology
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000616-7-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ilya Kasavin 
ORCID: 0000-0002-1233-3182
Edition
Volume 57 Issue 2
Pages
6-19
Abstract
The article gives a generalized view of the historical epistemology and highlights its main problems: the nature of historical reality, historical knowledge and historical agent. The historical epistemology represents a special philosophical discourse, the purpose of which is constructing historical knowledge for cultural assimilation of the new historical reality at the intersection of science and society. A distinction is proposed between the position of a historian of science and a historical epistemologist in terms of the essence of historical event and historical fact. The historical epistemology reveals its boundaries and a position within modern epistemological approaches. On the one hand, it is the substantialist interpretation of the historical event, which loses its a priori status only by socio-epistemological explanation. On the other hand, a figure of the historical agent (hero and author) keeping the status of a theoretical fiction in historical epistemology, acquires the adequate meaning in the existential philosophy of science.
Keywords
Historical epistemology, social epistemology, historical event, historical fact, anomaly, historical agent
Date of publication
01.06.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
625
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S1811-833X0000616-7-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 31.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Antonovsky, A.Yu. “Ontologia – chja zhe ona vsetaki doch?” [Ontology: Whose Child Is It?], Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2018, no. 45, pp. 217‒216. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Cartwright, N. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 247 pp.
    3. 

  3. Kant, I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdenia [Kritik der Urteilskraft]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1994, 367 pp. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Kasavin, I.T. Migratia. Kreativnost. Tekst. Problemi neklassicheskoj teorii poznanija [Migration. Creativity. Text. Issues of Non-Classical Theory of Knwoledge]. Saint Petersburg: RHGI, 1999, 408 pp.(In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Kasavina, N.A. “Kak vozmozhna ekzistentialnaya filosofia nauki?” [How Is Existential Philosophy of Science Possible?], Istoria i filosofia nauki v epokhu peremen [History and Philosophy of Science in the Age of Change], vol. 5. Moscow: ROIFN, 2018, pp. 32‒24. (In Russian)
    6. 

  6. Latour, B. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993, ix + 157 pp.
    7. 

  7. Lyotard, J.-F. The Differend: Phrases In Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988, xvi+208 pp.
    8. 

  8. Nikifirov, A.L. “A rodilsya li uzhe malchik?” [Has the Boy Been Born Yet?], Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2018, no. 45, pp. 203‒206. (In Russian)
    9. 

  9. Rossiter, M.W. “The Matthew/Matilda Effect in Science”, Social Studies of Science, 1993, vol. 23, pp. 325‒341.
    10. 

  10. Sokolova, T.D. “Izmenenie, povtorenie i istoria” [Change, Repetition and History], Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2018, no. 45, pp. 222‒225.(In Russian)
    11. 

  11. Stepin, V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie [Theoretical Knowledge]. Moscow: Progress Traditsiya, 2003, 743 p.(In Russian)
    12. 

  12. Stoliarova, O.E. “Istoricheskaja ontologia kak problema” [Historical Ontology as a Problem], Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2018, no. 45, pp. 194‒202.(In Russian)
    13. 

  13. Taleb, N.N. The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House, 2007, 400 pp.
    14.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate