On the Individual’s Role in Ethnohistory: Alexei Mametiev and the Ethnic Construction of the Nagaibaks
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
On the Individual’s Role in Ethnohistory: Alexei Mametiev and the Ethnic Construction of the Nagaibaks
Annotation
PII
S086954150001478-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrei Golovnev 
Affiliation: Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera)
Address: 3 University Emb.
Svetlana Belorussova
Affiliation: Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera)
Address: 3 University Emb.
Edition
5
Pages
78-94
Abstract

The Nagaibaks, people of the South Urals, have a relatively short (about three centuries long) ethnic history and impressive successes in the current ethnic construction. To what extent do the Nagaibaks, who had been called in various times “Newly-Baptized”, “Cossacks”, or “Tatars”, rely today on old traditions, react to political impetuses, or follow the ideas of their leader – all these issues are in the focus of the article which is drawn on materials of the authors’ fieldwork. Mametiev’s unpublished memoirs as well as evidences supplied by his relatives and friends, companions and rivals allow us to disclose the motives and circumstances which turned the former officer and party-functionary into the ethnic leader of the Nagaibaks. The observations point to a key personal role of the leader in the life course of the people, particularly noticeable in a critical episode of the ethnic history when the Nagaibaks succeeded in gaining the status of small-numbered indigenous people of Russia.

Keywords
ethnohistory, Nagaibaks, Urals, ethnicity, identity, leadership, dynamics
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the following institutions and grants: Russian Science Foundation, https://doi.org/10.13039/501100006769 [grant no. 18-78-10077]
Received
26.12.2018
Date of publication
26.12.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
640
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Atnagulov, I.R. 2015. Identichnosti nagaibakov: genezis, struktura, dinamika [Identities of the Nagaibaks: Origin, Structure, Dynamics]. Cheliabinsk: Cheliabinskii gosudarstvennyi kraevedcheskii muzei.

2. Atnagulov, I.R. 2015. Kriashenskii i nagaibakskii voprosy v Rossii nachala XXI v. (politicheskii, akademicheskii i obshchestvennyi diskursy) [The Kriashen and Nagaibak Issues in Russia of the Early 21st Century (Political, Academic, and Social Discourses)]. Problemy istorii, filologii, kultury 4 (50): 237–242.

3. Atnagulov, I.R. 2015. Struktura nagaibakskikh identichnostei: istoriia i faktory formirovaniia [The Structure of Nagaibak Identities: A History and Factors of Formation]. Uralskii istoricheskii vestnik 2 (47): 133–143.

4. Atnagulov, I.R. 2016. Nagaibaki: ot sosloviia k etnosu (k voprosu o genezise identichnosti) [The Nagaibaks: From a Social Stratum to Ethnos (on the Development of Identity)]. Arkheologiia, etnografiia i antropologiia Evrazii 44 (1): 137–146. https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0102.2016.44.1

5. Atnagulov, I.R. 2017. Etnicheskaia istoriia nagaibakov v XVIII – nachale XXI vekov: stanovlenie i transformatsiia identichnostei [An Ethnic History of the Nagaibaks in the 18th – Early 21st Centuries]. PhD diss., Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk.

6. Belorussova, S. Yu. 2015. Raznye sud’by: tri gruppy nagaibakov Yuzhnogo Urala [Different Destinies: Three Groups of the Nagaibaks of the South Urals]. Etnopanorama 1–2: 109–114.

7. Belorussova, S. Yu. 2017. Dinamika etnichnosti nagaibakov v XVIII–XXI vv. [Dynamics of the Nagaibaks’ Ethnicity in the 18th – 21st Centuries]. PhD diss., Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera), St. Petersburg.

8. Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

9. Golovnev, A.V. 2009. Dreif etnichnosti [Drift of Ethnicity]. Uralskii istoricheskii vestnik 4 (25): 46–55.

10. Golovnev, A.V. 2010. Krupnyi plan v antropologii [A Close-Up View in Anthropology]. Uralskii istoricheskii vestnik 4 (29): 14–20.

11. Golovnev, A.V., S. Yu. Belorussova, and T. S. Kisser. 2018. Veb-etnografiia i kiber-etnichnost’ [Web-Ethnography and Cyber-Ethnicity]. Uralskii istoricheskii vestnik 1: 100–108.

12. Golovnev, A.V., E. V. Perevalova, S. Yu. Belorussova, and T. S. Kisser. 2016. Etnoproekt, ili personalizatsiia etnichnosti (po materialam Ural’skoi EtnoEkspeditsii) [Ethnoproject, or Personalization of Ethnicity (Drawn on Materials of the Urals Ethnic Expedition)]. Uralskii istoricheskii vestnik 4 (53): 142–148.

13. Sokolovskiy, S.V. 2009. Kriasheny vo Vserossiiskoi perepisi naseleniia 2002 goda [The Kriashen in the 2002 All-Russian Census]. Naberezhnye Chelny: KriashIzdat.

14. Toynbee, A.J. 1991. Postizhenie istorii [A Study of History]. Moscow: Progress.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate