Везде
Program-target approach effectiveness problems in the strategic management of Russian economy
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Program-target approach effectiveness problems in the strategic management of Russian economy
Annotation
PII
S020736760019202-1-
DOI
10.31857/S020736760019203-2
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volkova Elena 
ORCID: 0000-0002-5986-7894
Occupation: Postgraduate student
Affiliation: macroeconomic policy and strategic management department faculty of Economics Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
59-76
Abstract

The article provides an overview of the main methods for assessing the effectiveness of the program-target approach used in the Russian Federation. Strategic management is currently ineffective, because established national goals are not achieved within the specified time frame. This is due both to the shortcomings of the implementation of the program-target approach in the Russian Federation, and to the problems of using evaluation tools. As part of the study, a structural analysis of the planned expenditures of the federal budget of the Russian Federation for 2022-2024 has been carried out, the share of program and non-program budget expenses was determined, as well as the share of the project and process part of the expenses It is concluded that most of the current budget expenditures in the Russian Federation are financed within the framework of the program-target approach while the requirements of the program-target approach are not met by most state programs. The presence of various types of expenditures in the state programs of the Russian Federation leads to difficulties in assessing their effectiveness. Based on the results of the study, recommendations are proposed for improving the methodology for evaluating state programs.

Keywords
strategic management, program-target approach, government programs, program effectiveness, government policy, economic management, efficiency assessment methods
Received
13.03.2022
Date of publication
17.06.2022
Number of purchasers
11
Views
643
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S020736760019202-1-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 08.06.2022
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. O sisteme upravleniya gosudarstvennymi programmami Rossijskoj Federatsii [Ehlektronnyj resurs]: postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 26.05.2021 g. № 786. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 13.10.2021).

2. Ob utverzhdenii Osnov gosudarstvennoj politiki v sfere strategicheskogo planirovaniya v Rossijskoj Federatsii. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 08.11.2021 № 633. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 19.12.2021).

3. Perechen' initsiativ sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federatsii do 2030 goda [Ehlektronnyj resurs]: Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 06.10.2021 g. № 2816-r. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 13.10.2021).

4. Havens H.S. Integrating evaluation and budgeting // Gerald Miller. Performance Based Budgeting-Routledge. 2018. 520 p.

5. Bourgeois I., Whynot J. Strategic evaluation utilization in the Canadian federal government // Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 2018; 32(3). https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.43179

6. Guyadeen D., Seasons M. Evaluation theory and practice: Comparing program evaluation and evaluation in planning // Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2018; 38(1):98-110. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16675930

7. Arbour G. Frameworks for program evaluation: Considerations on research, practice, and institutions // Evaluation. 2020; 26(4):422-437. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020920890

8. Crane M. et al. Applying pragmatic approaches to complex program evaluation: A case study of implementation of the New South Wales Get Healthy at Work program // Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2019; 30(3):422-432. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/hpja.239

9. Auzan A.A. Strategiya dolgosrochnogo razvitiya Rossii: novizna podkhoda // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ehkonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2015. T. 196. № 7. S. 229-241.

10. Ob utverzhdenii Pravil formirovaniya svodnogo godovogo doklada o khode realizatsii i otsenke ehffektivnosti gosudarstvennykh programm Rossijskoj Federatsii, vnesenii izmenenij v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossijskoj Federatsii i priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel'nykh polozhenij nekotorykh aktov Pravitel'stva Rossijskoj Federatsii [Ehlektronnyj resurs]: Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 17.07.2019 №903 (red. ot 02.11.2021). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 01.12.2021).

11. Sajt Schetnoj palaty RF. URL: https://ach.gov.ru (data obrascheniya: 18.01.2022).

12. Klepach A.N. Povorot k strategicheskomu planirovaniyu: ternii i perspektivy // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii. 2016. № 1. S. 44-63.

13. Kudrin A.L., Knobel' A.Yu. Byudzhetnaya politika kak istochnik ehkonomicheskogo rosta // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2017. №. 10. S. 5-26. URL: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-5-26

14. Sukharev O.S. Strukturnyj analiz vliyaniya natsional'nykh proektov na ehkonomiku Rossii // Ehkonomicheskaya nauka – khozyajstvennoj praktike / Materialy XIX Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii, Kostroma, 21–22 maya 2019 goda // Kostroma: Kostromskoj gosudarstvennyj universitet. 2019. 324 s.

15. Margolin A.M. Puti sovershenstvovaniya metodov otsenki ehffektivnosti gosudarstvennykh programm // Ehkonomicheskaya politika. 2018. T. 13. №. 6. C. 54-81. URL: https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2018-6-54-81.

16. Zolotareva A.B., Sokolov I.A. Aktual'nye voprosy strategicheskogo planirovaniya i audita v sovremennoj Rossii // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2021. №5. C. 29-41. URL: https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-188-29-41.

17. Tenyakov I.M. Strukturnye faktory ehkonomicheskoj dinamiki v Rossii // Internatsional'noe i natsional'noe v ehkonomicheskom razvitii v XXI veke (v svete ehkonomicheskoj teorii): kollektivnaya monografiya / pod red. A.A. Porokhovskogo, A.V. Sorokina // M.: Ehkonomicheskij fakul'tet MGU imeni M. V. Lomonosova. 2021. 374 s.

18. Volkova E.Yu. Mesto programmno-tselevogo podkhoda v sisteme strategicheskogo upravleniya ehkonomikoj RF // Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyajstvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN. 2021. S. 167-191. URL: https://doi.org/10.47711/2076-318-2021-167-191.

19. Ob organizatsii proektnoj deyatel'nosti v Pravitel'stve Rossijskoj Federatsii [Ehlektronnyj resurs]: Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 31 oktyabrya 2018 g. № 1288). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 04.12.2021).

20. Liberman T.I., Gurina M.A. Programmno-tselevoe planirovanie: podkhody, instrumenty, tendentsii razvitiya: monografiya // M.: Pervoe ehkonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo. 2020. 162 s. URL: https://doi.org/10.18334/9785912923067.

21. O federal'nom byudzhete na 2022 god i na planovyj period 2023 i 2024 godov [Ehlektronnyj resurs]: Federal'nyj zakon ot 06.12.2021 №390-FZ. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 13.01.2022).

22. O natsional'nykh tselyakh i strategicheskikh zadachakh razvitiya Rossijskoj Federatsii na period do 2024 goda. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]: ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 07.05.2018 №204 (red. ot 21.07.2020). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 01.04.2021).

23. O natsional'nykh tselyakh razvitiya Rossijskoj Federatsii na period do 2030 goda. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]: ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 21 iyul. 2020 g. №474. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 01.04.2021).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate