Везде
AN EXAMINATION OF THE PROCESSES OF RUSSIAN SCIENTISTS' SOCIALIZATION AND PROFESSIONALIZATION IN THE 18TH AND THE FIRST HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
AN EXAMINATION OF THE PROCESSES OF RUSSIAN SCIENTISTS' SOCIALIZATION AND PROFESSIONALIZATION IN THE 18TH AND THE FIRST HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY
Annotation
PII
S0205-96060000616-4-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalya Kuznetsova  Galina Krivosheina Alexander Rodny Olga Elina
Edition
Volume 37 Issue 3
Pages
479-505
Abstract
The paper examines the early period in the development of science as profession in Russia. To this end, a new conceptual approach was developed to study the processes of the scientists' socialization and professionalization. The proposed study program includes the following: (a) the search for a system of the cognitive and institutional structures of scientific activities; (b) the analysis of the disciplinary structure of scientific knowledge; (c) the study on the roles of individual professional groups in the development of natural science community; and (d) the identification of the factors that influenced the persons' motivation to pursue scientific work. The conclusions stemming from this study provide a reference point for further studies on the historico-scientific aspects of the scientists' professional careers. In the 18th century, professional cadre for natural science in Russia mostly comprised foreign scientists, professors and teachers or alumni of the European universities. However, the Russian scientists, graduates of the Academic University, Moscow University, European universities, and medical and engineering schools, emerged as early as in the second half of the 18th century. In the early 19th century, Russian science became able to develop relatively independently from the state - within the framework of the scientific and scientific-and-practical societies. The inflow of scientific personnel into natural science was mostly from among the physicians and pharmacists, mining and military engineers, as well as from among the teachers at educational institutions, who were mostly medical professionals and engineers too. Professional teachers who were graduates from teachers colleges at the universities began to engage in scientific work in the 19th century.
Keywords
scientific community, professionalization of science, socialization of scientists, science in Russia, motivation of scientific activity, cognitive and institutional structures
Date of publication
01.07.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1417
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-96060000616-4-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 26.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Vernadskij V. I. Ocherki po istorii estestvoznaniya v Rossii v XVIII stoletii. Moskva: Nauka, 1988 
 2. Kuznetsova N. I. Sotsiokul'turnye problemy formirovaniya nauki v Rossii (XVPI -seredina XIX vv.). Moskva: URSS, 1997 
 3. Kolchinskij Eh. I., Sytin A. K., Smagina G. I. Estestvennaya istoriya v Rossii (ocherki razvitiya estestvoznaniya v Rossii v XVPI veke). SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2004. 
 4. Rodnyj A. N. Institutsional'nye i kognitivnye bar'ery professional'noj mobil'nosti uchenykh//Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologij. 2014. T. 5. № 4. S. 48. 
 5. Eisenstaedt, S. N. Social Institutions//International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences/D. L. Sills (ed.). London: Macmillan; New York: The Free Press, 1968. Vol. 14. P. 409-410.
 6. Storer, N. W. The Social System of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966. R. 55-56. 
 7. Ben-Dehvid Dzh. Rol' uchenogo v obschestve. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. S. 149. 
 8. Jones, R. F. Ancients and Modems: A Study of the Rise of the Scientific Movement in Seventeenth Century England. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1965. 
 9. Ben-Dehvid. Rol' uchenogo v obschestve. S. 153-154, 161-162. 
 10. Moran, B. German Prince-Practitioners: Aspects in the Development of Courtly Science, Technology, and Procedures in the Renaissance//Technology and Culture. 1981. Vol. 22. P. 253-274 
 11. Lux, D. S. Patronage and Royal Science in Seventeenth-Century France: The Académie de Physique in Caen. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 1989 
 12. Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism/M. Biagioli (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993 
 13. Biagioli, M. Galileo's System of Patronage//History of Science. 1990. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 1-62
 14. Biagioli, M. Galileo the Emblem Maker//Isis. 1990. Vol. 81. No. 2. P. 230-258.
 15. Vvedenie v sotsiologiyu nauki. V 2 ch./Red. S. A. Kugel', N. S. Chernyakova. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet ehkonomiki i finansov, 1992. Ch. 1. S. 91. 
 16. Kugel' S. A., Davidyuk S. F. Struktura i dinamika nauchnykh kadrov//Sotsial'naya dinamika sovremennoj nauki/Red. V. Zh. Kelle. M.: Nauka, 1995. S. 47. 
 17. Letopis' Moskovskogo universiteta. V 3 t./Avt.-sost. E. V. Il'chenko. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2004. T. 1: 1755-1951. S. 67. 
 18. V evropejskikh universitetakh podobnykh fakul'tetov v to vremya ne suschestvovalo. 
 19. Letopis' Moskovskogo universiteta. S. 73, 123. 
 20. Volkov V. A., Kulikova M. V. Rossijskaya professura. KhUSh -nachalo XX v. Biologicheskie i mediko-biologicheskie nauki. Biograficheskij slovar'. SPb.: Izd-vo RKhGI, 2003. S. 513. 
 21. Iodko O. V. Glavnaya fizicheskaya observatoriya na Vasil'evskom ostrove (po dokumentam SPF ARAN)//http://www.ranar.spb.ru/rus/books6/id/574/. 
 22. Volkov V. A., Kulikova M. V. Rossijskaya professura. XVIII -nachalo XX v. Fiziko-matematicheskie nauki. Biograficheskij slovar'. SPb.: Mir' 2008. 
 23. Ivanov A. E., Stepanskij A. D. Obschestvennye organizatsii v akademicheskom prostranstve Rossii XIX -nachala XX v.//Samoorganizatsiya rossijskoj obschestvennosti v poslednej treti XVSh -nachale XX v. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2011. S. 472. 
 24. Elina O. Yu. Ot tsarskikh sadov do sovetskikh polej: istoriya sel'skokhozyajstvennykh uchrezhdenij XVIII -20-e gody KhKh v. M.: Ehgmont Rossiya, 2008. T. 1. S. 373. 
 25. Vysochajshe utverzhdennyj ustav Imperatorskogo Moskovskogo universiteta//Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii, s 1649 goda. SPb.: Tip. Vtorogo otdeleniya Sobstvennoj Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva kantselyarii, 1830. T 28: 1804-1805. № 21498. S. 570-589. 
 26. Vysochajshe utverzhdennyj Obschij ustav imperatorskikh universitetov//Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii: sobranie vtoroe. SPb: Tip. Vtorogo otdeleniya Sobstvennoj Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva kantselyarii, 1836. T 10: 1835. Ch. 1. S. 841-855. 
 27. Kolchinskij Eh. I., Fedotova A. A. Biologiya v Sankt-Peterburge. 1703-2008. Ehntsiklopedicheskij slovar'. SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2011. S. 179. 
 28. Zablotskij E. M. Gornoe vedomstvo dorevolyutsionnoj Rossii: Ocherk istorii: Biograficheskij slovar'. M.: Novyj khronograf, 2014. 
 29. Volkov V. A., Vonskij E. V., Kuznetsova G. I. Vydayuschiesya khimiki mira: biograficheskij spravochnik. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1991. S. 270, 412 
 30. Vorob'eva O. V. Tajna belogo metalla//Khimiya i zhizn' -XXI vek. 2015. № 3. S. 21-23. 
 31. Krylov-Tolstikovich A. Russkie vrachi XVIII -nachala XX stoletij. Kratkij meditsinskij biograficheskij slovar'//http://www.proza.ru/2012/12/27/678. 
 32. Mirskij M. B. Meditsina Rossii XVI-XIX vv. M.: ROSSPEhN, 1996. S. 83. 
 33. Bakshaev A. A. Gornyj uchenyj komitet i gornye nauchnye obschestva na Urale//Dokument. Arkhiv. Istoriya. Sovremennost'. Sb. nauchnykh trudov. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UGU, 2010. Vyp. 11. S. 109-110. 
 34. Vishlenkova E. A., Il'ina K. A. Ob uchenykh stepenyakh i o tom, kak dissertatsiya v Rossii obretala nauchnuyu i prakticheskuyu znachimost'//Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2013. T. 122. № 4. S. 84. 
 35. Vicinich, A. Science in Russian Culture: A History to 1860. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1963.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate